httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@covalent.net
Subject Re: ap_ vs apr_
Date Wed, 26 Jul 2000 22:06:46 GMT
On 26 Jul 2000, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> rbb@covalent.net writes:
> 
> > On 26 Jul 2000, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > 
> > > Doug MacEachern <dougm@covalent.net> writes:
> > > > i can see libapr being used for lots of things outside of the server,
i
> > > > just wish i could use it inside 1.3 without having hacking it.
> > > > if anybody wants to reconsider, i'm +1 on using the apr_ prefix for all
> > > > libapr functions.
> > > 
> > > What about the prefix for data types? (half serious or half joking)
> > 
> > Everything in APR would need to new prefix.
> 
> Then I'm +1 (but groaning at the thought of a lot more misindented
> code when this is done :) ).

That's what perl is for.  :-)  Besides, why would there be misindented
code?

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message