httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: [PATCH] revised, final filtering patch. (ready for review)
Date Wed, 05 Jul 2000 09:45:05 GMT

On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Greg Stein wrote:

> Okay... you posted this on Saturday and it is fast becoming Wednesday. Are
> you ready to give a slow answer yet? :-)

No, I am at this moment packing my stuff into a sea container to have it
ready to ship on Friday. Real Live Things take priority for the next 48
hours.
 
> If you have a veto in place, then I'd think it would be obvious to you what
> the issue was. Or is it simply difficult to articulate? 

Yes. Both yours and Ryans designs are lacking in area's IMHO and I simply
do not want salami tacktics; i.e. 'fixing' each little nit and little
issue than rather to go for the beef. There are lots of postings from both
Dean, Roy, Cliff, Ryan and various others about the core design and I am
going through them slowly, summarizing their points and trying to come
with a coherent approach.

So this is the simple reason I am not going to fall for a simple tick-off
list of small nits. I want to address the whole or at least convince
myself that we are not wielding the hood shut. And end up with a 3.0
strand in no time.

> Please let me know, as I'd like to see your veto removed.

Why this incredible rush ? If we are in a rush to get 2.0 out; then we can
always do it without filtering ? Doing filtering according to your design
in 2.0 would lead to a 2.1 or 3.0 rather soon I fear ? Or is this
something the group wants ?

Dw


Mime
View raw message