Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 16435 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2000 16:27:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 16348 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2000 16:27:43 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: mojo.covalent.net: dougm owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:26:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug MacEachern To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: mod_perl questions, and one on mod_isapi In-Reply-To: <000601bfe0f1$93fd1480$345985d0@corecomm.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Two, actually... > > Has anyone ever tossed out a patch to fix compatibility with Perl 5.005 > and PERL_OBJECT for mod_perl (to mod_perl)? yes, and it's a bloody mess. PERL_OBJECT support is going away in favor of ITHREADS, which also works on platforms other than win32. > For that matter, has anyone > tried hacking it with the threading support? (not both, of course.) yes, see the modperl-2.0 cvs tree on locus. > I ask because we seem to wait lock on the first mod_perl request until > it completes, according to reports from bugs.apache.org - and as we > roll the 2.0 MPMs this may become important to more than simply Win32. that doesn't happen anymore with Perl 5.6.0 and mod_perl-2.0. > Is mod_perl still a supported ASF subproject? yes. > If so, what is the other sourcegarden project about? stas bekman can explain this. > And finally, does mod_isaspi have a maintainer? you? ;)