Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 28340 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2000 16:16:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 28029 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2000 16:16:46 -0000 Message-ID: <3937DDB4.F072A2D9@Golux.Com> Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 12:15:48 -0400 From: Rodent of Unusual Size Organization: The Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src/modules/standard mod_auth_digest.c References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N rbb@covalent.net wrote: > > I seriously hate having some functions return APR_ENOTIMPL and others > cause a compile break. I will fight this tooth and nail because it > changes the rules on developers half-way through the game. :-) I agree, but not because we're changing the rules 'half-way through the game.' We're still in alpha, and there ARE no rules. Consistency is necessary, so either APR_ENOTIMPL or compile breakage, but not a mix. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar Apache Software Foundation "Apache Server for Dummies" "Apache Server Unleashed"