Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 11:25:07 -0700
From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: what are the issues? (was: Re: Patch review: ...)
Message-ID: <20000629112507.X29590@lyra.org>
Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org
References: <20000627033945.J29590@lyra.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006270731240.4006-100000@koj.rkbloom.net>
 <20000627171846.V29590@lyra.org> <395B90D6.A70C0972@Golux.Com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <395B90D6.A70C0972@Golux.Com>;
 from Ken.Coar@Golux.Com on Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 02:09:26PM -0400

On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 02:09:26PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Greg, have you actually *tried* Ryan's patch(es)?
> Ryan, have you actually *tried* Greg's patch(es)?
> If the answer to either is 'no,' then please stop the
> theoretical handwaving and DO IT.  Then see if your
> theories are supported by the evidence.  This is
> is an aspect of the 'scientific method,' which I
> submit is more appropriate here than Philosophy 101.
> 
> And no, I haven't [yet] tried *either* patch.  But then
> neither am I yelling that either of them is broken.
> 
> This yammering is really starting to get on my nerves.

We're past the yammering, and are working on the "challenge problem" now :-)

My issues with Ryan's patches have been from code inspections. Each issue
was derivable from that standpoint alone.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/