Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 59661 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2000 05:08:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 59650 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2000 05:08:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 01:05:50 -0400 Message-Id: <200006160505.BAA28979@k5.localdomain> X-Authentication-Warning: k5.localdomain: trawick set sender to trawick@ibm.net using -f From: Jeff Trawick To: vjo@duke.edu, new-httpd@apache.org In-reply-to: (vjo@duke.edu) Subject: Re: [PATCH] AIX proper diagnosis and pthread usage Reply-to: trawick@ibm.net References: X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 22:43:09 -0400 (EDT) > From: "Victor J. Orlikowski" > > Actually, it's more specific than even an AIX 4.3.3 problem. > It's an AIX 4.3.3 and GCC problem; this does not happen when using > xlc. With xlc you won't fail the normal check and thus you won't go into the let's-see-if-this-is-AIX-4.3.3 logic. > Compromise: How about I put a check for GCC, which does support -w as an > option for the cpp, and have that take care of it? That should do it too. It will deviate from the norm on more platforms, though I don't think it will have any negative effects. Anybody out there that knows what they're doing with autoconf care to speak up? (hmmm... I got this e-mail at trawick@ibm.net 'cause he sent it there in addition to new-httpd... I haven't gotten it via new-httpd even at my subscription on locus and I don't see it in the archive) -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@ibm.net | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien...