Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 78994 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2000 05:19:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 78981 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2000 05:19:19 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 01:19:19 -0400 From: Manoj Kasichainula To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0 STATUS Message-ID: <20000611011919.A2355@manojk.users.mindspring.com> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: <20000610172146.57973.qmail@locus.apache.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.3i In-Reply-To: <20000610172146.57973.qmail@locus.apache.org>; from gstein@locus.apache.org on Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 05:21:46PM -0000 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 05:21:46PM -0000, gstein@locus.apache.org wrote: > + > + * Go through ap_config.h and namespace-protect the symbols (e.g. USE_*). > + Some symbols can/should move to mpm_common.h where possible. This discussion was had before. The original intention was that ap_config.h shouldn't be included, directly or indirectly, outside Apache and its bundled modules. If it is being included, why?