Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 50299 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2000 19:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 50287 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2000 19:25:30 -0000 Message-ID: <04d201bfdaed$be4c29b0$c1e01b09@raleigh.ibm.com> From: "Bill Stoddard" To: Subject: Any reason not to timeout buffered i/o? Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 15:28:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ap_read() (in /file_io/*/readwrite.c) does timeouts for unbufferd i/o but not for buffered i/o. Is there a good reason for this? Bill