From new-httpd-return-4568-apmail-new-httpd-archive=apache.org@apache.org Mon Jun 05 22:20:53 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 51027 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2000 22:20:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 51011 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2000 22:20:51 -0000 Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 18:20:47 -0400 Message-Id: <200006052220.SAA03789@k5.localdomain> X-Authentication-Warning: k5.localdomain: trawick set sender to trawickj@bellsouth.net using -f From: Jeff Trawick To: new-httpd@apache.org In-reply-to: (rbb@covalent.net) Subject: Re: [PATCH] change mmap feature test Reply-to: trawickj@bellsouth.net References: X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: rbb@covalent.net > Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 14:03:14 -0700 (PDT) > > On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Greg Ames wrote: > > > Whoops...my mmap patch from last Friday collided with David Reid's patch > > for BeOS mmap emulation. I reworked mine so everybody should be happy. > > David, could you verify that this works on BeOS? > > Can we come up with one way to test for MMAP? It look like 390 could just > add itself to the OS case statment and define mmap_emul, and everything > would work. Am I missing something? > > Ryan The one way we have to test now checks for a feature which we don't use and which OS/390 doesn't support and which the Single Unix Specification discourages the use of. It doesn't seem too farfetched to change our test so that we don't check for features that Apache doesn't need. We could play the mmap_emul game, but that wouldn't help some other platform that may not support MAP_FIXED. -- Jeff Trawick | trawick@ibm.net | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ Born in Roswell... married an alien...