httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@lyra.org>
Subject Re: Apache 2.0a4?
Date Fri, 02 Jun 2000 20:29:29 GMT
On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2000 rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> > Are we rolling the 4th alpha today?  I am in the middle of re-vamping the
> > config stuff to play nicer together, and I would love to commit some stuff
> > later today, but this is a relatively large change, and I want to make
> > sure I don't commit just before the alpha.
> 
> I'm getting ready to roll it.

+1 to do it asap.

>...
> It would make sense if someone else from apache could sign my key, I've
> put it on locus in ~ask/asks.asc ... I guess that we can trust our shared
> box there enough for it to be reasonable to sign.

Not sure who would do this. Don't even know how :-)

> > On the same note, what is the status with the BugDB?  Are we posting a
> > new 2.0 bug DB or are we just using GNATS?  Regardless, is somebody
> > going to move the current 2.0 bugs to the new DB?
> 
> And until the bugdb situation is sorted out I think we should put 1.3.12
> above 2.0a on the httpd.html page. (We don't really want more users when
> we can't even take their bug reports, do we?)

1.3 should be above 2.0, regardless of the bug db situation. 1.3 is usable
and is what most people are going to be interested in seeing and using.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/


Mime
View raw message