httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Keith Wannamaker" <...@raleigh.ibm.com>
Subject RE: [patch 1.3.13-dev] Win9x Services
Date Fri, 09 Jun 2000 19:32:31 GMT
Looks OK, thanks for making the change.

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@lnd.com]
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 3:25 PM
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: RE: [patch 1.3.13-dev] Win9x Services


> From: Keith Wannamaker [mailto:krw@raleigh.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 1:41 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: RE: [patch 1.3.13-dev] Win9x Services
> 
> I still think the extra -k runservice flag is unnecessary
> because it is a special case of -k start.  If you are going
> to put it in, at least add it to the -h output and make it
> do something on NT, or at the very least return an error.

No -k runservice in the committed patch :-)

It's now a test for service_name && !isWindowsNT()
&& !strcasecmp(signal_to_send, "start") 

That's what you were aiming for, I hope?

Bill



Mime
View raw message