httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Land a Man on the Moon
Date Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:07:38 GMT
Of course, this all requires a working bug database :)

Can someone fill me in, offline if they want, the current status?
I'd like to take a look!

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
> > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2000 5:28 PM
> > 
> > At ApacheCon 2000, we had the goal of getting 2.0a1 out, and by the
> > work and dedication of various people, it happened. It appears
> > to me, that setting a goal to have 2.0 (no alpha, no beta, plain
> > old 2.0) for ApacheCon 2000 Europe is within our grasp. This means
> > a beta soon...
> > 
> > Who says yes? Who says no?
> 
> Absolutely +1 to the roll of 2.0 release .0 on 23 October 2000.
> 
> It means, of course, beta 1 (or whatever we call it, I already surmized
> that each alpha number used up at beta rev no.)  If each beta catches
> 80% of the bugs, 2 betas catch 96% of the bugs, 3 betas catch 99.2% 
> before release 0.  If we seriously expect to roll three fast betas,
> we need to drop no. 1 on 28 July, a little over one month away.  That's
> allow a four week window for users to break and coders to fix (not every
> bug identified prior to each subsiquent beta, though :)
> 
> I would be very happy to see three betas to get there, and won't count
> the alphas.  Without binaries, many testers aren't.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"

Mime
View raw message