httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manoj Kasichainula <man...@io.com>
Subject Re: Filter I/O take 3.
Date Sat, 17 Jun 2000 07:28:11 GMT
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 07:49:43PM -0700, rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> I agree.  Apache 2.0 is not going to be async, and it doesn't need to
> support it.  3.0 may be async.  It will require almost a complete re-write
> if that is going to happen.  Take a look at the STATUS file, a re-org for
> async is actually in there for post-2.0.  I do not want 2.0 to become a
> kitchen sink again.  Adding async I/O to 2.0 is a bad idea and I will
> fight it.

+1. No, I don't think the current I/O architectures being discussed
will necessarily fit in well with an async architecture, but an async
architecture also allows some much cooler layering systems I think, so
I figure it'll all get thrown out for 3.0.


Mime
View raw message