Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 22364 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2000 00:52:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 22351 invoked from network); 28 May 2000 00:52:34 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: koj.rkbloom.net: rbb owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 17:51:55 -0700 (PDT) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj.rkbloom.net To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Review then commit. In-Reply-To: <39306A1B.3EF314F1@Golux.Com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > MSNHO is that the repository should *remain* a sandbox for at > least several betas. > > And who says we're getting close to the end of the alpha cycle, > anyway? The fact that there are basically no showstoppers left in the STATUS file. And when we last had a bug DB for 2.0, there were under 10 bugs in it. > > but IMO our alpha's need to start becoming VERY stable beasts. > > I disagree very, very strongly. Would you care to explain why, and maybe put some bugs in the STATUS file. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------