Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 95861 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2000 17:29:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 95684 invoked from network); 23 May 2000 17:29:17 -0000 Sender: chuck Message-ID: <392ABFDA.1AF0CE44@topsail.org> Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 13:28:58 -0400 From: Chuck Murcko Organization: The Topsail Group X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: I want to contribute a software I've written.] References: <392A9F45.A7382D9F@Golux.Com> <392ABF6F.A129C60@topsail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Whoops. It would have excluded GPL'ed code from Apache projects per se. I'm not sure how it would apply to a loosely organized body of contrib code. Chuck Murcko wrote: > > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > > > Acked. Do we have a position about contrib stuff on our sites yet? > > Particularly if GPLed? > > We discussed Roy's suggested contributor's guidelines, which would have > answered this. > > Did we ever decide to recommend adopting them or sending them to the > board for a vote? > > I'm +1 for that, though it would exclude GPL'ed code. > -- > Chuck > Chuck Murcko > Topsail Group > chuck@topsail.org -- Chuck Chuck Murcko Topsail Group chuck@topsail.org