Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 62823 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2000 01:47:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 62812 invoked from network); 9 May 2000 01:47:50 -0000 From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200005090147.VAA23707@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src/lib/apr hints.m4 To: new-httpd@apache.org Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 21:47:46 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: from "Greg Stein" at May 08, 2000 06:41:11 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Greg Stein wrote: > > On 9 May 2000 jim@locus.apache.org wrote: > >... > > --- hints.m4 2000/05/03 18:27:13 1.3 > > +++ hints.m4 2000/05/09 01:40:14 1.4 > > @@ -5,11 +5,36 @@ > > dnl We allow all settings to be overridden from > > dnl the command-line. > > dnl > > +dnl We maintain the "format" that we've used > > +dnl under 1.3.x, so we don't exactly follow > > +dnl what is "recommended" by autoconf. > > If we're going the autoconf route, then shouldn't we *really* do autoconf? > Toss the old "format" since people won't expect it. > Yeah, but _NOBODY_ else does things like setting CPPFLAGS, or stuff like that. People assume CFLAGS for everything, although autoconf says it should only be for optim or debug. I'm fine with either way, but this also means we need to adjust all out Makefiles to support CPPFLAGS, etc.... :) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"