Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 20073 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2000 08:53:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 20055 invoked from network); 9 May 2000 08:53:30 -0000 Message-ID: <010f01bfb993$73f48900$0a1aa8c0@jetnet.co.uk> From: "David Reid" To: References: Subject: Re: [Fwd: WAP/WML] Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 09:49:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'd guess a module might be better as it needs UDP support... Of course, we _could_ add udp to APR... (ducking and running away) :) ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Apache Developers" Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [Fwd: WAP/WML] > On Mon, 8 May 2000, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > > Passing the word.. I receive a lot of requests about > > this. Is there anything going on with this in 2.* that I've > > missed? > > There is nothing happening yet, but it should be relatively simple to > do. Either, a new protocol module or a simple proxy server, depending on > how different WAP is from HTTP. > > >From what I have heard (haven't done any research...yet), WAP is just > compressed HTTP, so a simple proxy that does the compresion, or a good > filtered/layered I/O implementation does this for us. > > Ryan > > ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ > Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org > 406 29th St. > San Francisco, CA 94131 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- > >