httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From dean gaudet <dgaudet-list-new-ht...@arctic.org>
Subject Re: Review then commit.
Date Sun, 28 May 2000 21:44:31 GMT
review then commit is *always* an impediment to bug fixing.

-dean

On Fri, 26 May 2000 rbb@covalent.net wrote:

> 
> I would like some feedback here to moving to a review then commit mode for
> 2.0.  We are getting VERY close to the end of the alpha cycle, and it is
> time to stop treating this like a sandbox finally.
> 
> One of the big things that is bothering me, is the sheer amount of code
> that went into the tree last night, with an alpha ready to be rolled
> tomorrow or Monday.  Yes, if the alpha is broken, we can just roll a new
> one, but IMO our alpha's need to start becoming VERY stable beasts.  This
> means taking some responsability to make sure that we aren't breaking
> things days before we put one out.
> 
> For right now, I would like to call off the next alpha, and straighten out
> the code that went in last night (I believe two or three showstoppers were
> introduced, but I am still checking, and then I will update STATUS), and
> after that is done, roll our next alpha.
> 
> Ryan
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message