> any distributor distributing a 2.3/2.4 kernel will mount the shmfs, and
> you should consider anyone that hasn't mounted it to be on crack -- you
> should always use shm on linux.
>
> in my opinion, applications shouldn't really adapt to "development"
> kernels such as the 2.3 series -- as soon as the shmfs thing happenned, it
> became a FAQ on linux-kernel, everyone said "apache is broken!" and
> everyone else responded "just mount shmfs you dolt".
And I emailed this list about it shortly after it happened as well.
-Rasmus
|