httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: WAP/WML]
Date Thu, 11 May 2000 17:14:49 GMT
Can't see any reason why not as they seem to have stabilised and are now in
widespread use.

d
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Finch" <dot@dotat.at>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: WAP/WML]


> "David Reid" <dreid@jetnet.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >Should we add the types needed then, as this should solve a few of
> >the questions.
>
> The types are there but without filename extensions. When I added
> them in October, Roy said in
<199910121733.aa17753@gremlin-relay.ics.uci.edu>
>
> > If you add the types to the file, don't add the filename extensions.
> > An extension added to the wrong type will change the behavior of an
> > existing server in odd ways.
>
> That's an argument against adding them for 1.3; perhaps they can be
> added to the 2.0 mime.types file.
>
> Tony.
> --
> f.a.n.finch    fanf@demon.net    dot@dotat.at
> 311 scabrous skivvy scrapings
>


Mime
View raw message