Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 74425 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2000 18:05:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 74409 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2000 18:05:19 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 14:05:17 -0400 (EDT) From: rbb@apache.org X-Sender: rbb@shell.ntrnet.net To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: RANT: Absolute Paths and configure In-Reply-To: <00c601bf9d93$4c9379f0$0a1aa8c0@jetnet.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: rbb@shell.ntrnet.net X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, David Reid wrote: > I think that that's one of the differences between autoconf for APR and > Apache. The APR one grew slowly bit by bit and was tested at every step of > the way. The beast in Apache was largely thrown together and some bits are > far too complicated for what we need. > > Ralf and I did ask for a period of consideration, but that's not how we do > things, is it ;-) > > Ryan's suggestion of flowcharting it would be a good starting point. Then > we can start to improve it and more importantly, document it! If we have a > document that says... Not my suggestion, it was Jim's. But, I'm all for it. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------