Return-Path: 
 <new-httpd-return-2169-apmail-new-httpd-archive=apache.org@apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 7715 invoked by uid 500); 7 Apr 2000 19:40:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
list-help: <mailto:new-httpd-help@apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:new-httpd-unsubscribe@apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:new-httpd@apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org
Received: (qmail 7704 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2000 19:40:56 -0000
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000407153716.00b03cc0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender: gregmm@pop.ma.ultranet.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 15:39:01 -0400
To: new-httpd@apache.org
From: Greg Marr <gregm@alum.wpi.edu>
Subject: Re: checking for EWOULDBLOCK/EAGAIN *inside* APR
In-Reply-To: <87pus11zzd.fsf@pobox.com>
References: <Jeff Trawick's message of "Fri, 7 Apr 2000 14:56:44 -0400">
 <200004071856.OAA20875@k5.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

At 03:18 PM 04/07/2000, Ben Hyde wrote:
>Jeff Trawick <trawickj@bellsouth.net> writes:
> > Ben mentioned a concern that something like "(errno == EAGAIN || 
> errno
> > == EWOULDBLOCK)" might lead to a compiler warning.  gcc -Wall 
> doesn't
> > emit one, however.  If we find a better solution later, we can 
> always
> > handle it then.
>
>I believe -Wall notices:
>
>   switch(errno){
>   case EAGAIN:
>   case EWOULDBLOCK:
>     ...
>   ...
>  }
>
>Not that it's imporant.

FYI, this is an error in VC++:

Compiler Error C2196
case value 'value' already used
A case value in a switch statement can be used only once.

--
Greg Marr
gregm@alum.wpi.edu
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"