Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 493 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2000 01:24:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 480 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2000 01:24:45 -0000 To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: apr_config.h is a private header... In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:56:33 EDT." Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:24:43 -0700 From: "Roy T. Fielding" Message-ID: <200004141824.aa26468@gremlin-relay.ics.uci.edu> X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >I'll be fixing this, but I am wondering what people would think of >renaming apr_config.h to apr_private.h. This should re-inforce the idea >that apr_config.h should never be included outside of private APR C files, >because it is not fully namespace protected. I'd recommend doing that just to avoid the confusion with ap_config.h. ....Roy