Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 13804 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2000 20:17:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 13793 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2000 20:17:02 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: dillinger.io.com: manojk set sender to manojk@io.com using -f Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 15:17:00 -0500 From: Manoj Kasichainula To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: apr_config.h is a private header... Message-ID: <20000414151700.A2470@io.com> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.9-current-20000328i In-Reply-To: ; from rbb@covalent.net on Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 12:56:33PM -0400 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 12:56:33PM -0400, rbb@covalent.net wrote: > I'll be fixing this, but I am wondering what people would think of > renaming apr_config.h to apr_private.h. This should re-inforce the idea > that apr_config.h should never be included outside of private APR C files, > because it is not fully namespace protected. It'd be better to move private include files out of the include directory. I'd like to do this with Apache as well.