Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 68704 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2000 15:38:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 68689 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2000 15:38:40 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: martin.kraemer@mch.sni.de (at relayer david.siemens.de) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 17:38:34 +0200 From: Martin Kraemer To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: [APR] Thread Lock Problem Message-ID: <20000410173832.H1702@deejai.mch.sni.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.4i X-Operating-System: SINIX-D 5.41 C1001 X-Organization: Fujitsu Siemens Computers (Muenchen, W.Germany) X-Phone: +49-89-636-46021 X-Disclaimer: THE COMMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE REFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE WRITER AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY THE VIEWS OF SIEMENS AG X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N If APR_HAS_THREADS == 1 but USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE is undefined, then the lock functions are not DEFINED (in lib/apr/locks/unix/intraproc.c), but they are still USED in lib/apr/locks/unix/locks.c! That results in unresolved symbols during link time. Which solution is more appropriate? a) define also if USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE is undefined, or b) use only if USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE is defined ? Martin -- | Fujitsu Siemens Fon: +49-89-636-46021, FAX: +49-89-636-41143 | 81730 Munich, Germany