Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 1792 invoked by uid 500); 6 Apr 2000 20:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 1655 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2000 20:58:50 -0000 Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 12:39:09 -0700 From: Manoj Kasichainula To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Massive changes to Win32 generated MAK files Message-ID: <20000406123909.F16239@manojk.users.mindspring.com> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: <008f01bf9e44$45860900$6fa0e320@apache> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.11i In-Reply-To: ; from gstein@lyra.org on Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 07:56:06PM -0700 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Assuming this hasn't already been hashed out... On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 07:56:06PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: > This does imply that Apache can be built only with VC and DevStudio. In > other words, is it a requirement to build it with, say, Borland products? > > Personally, I would just punt on support for using non-MSFT products to > build the thing. Python does this and there hasn't been any real flak > about it, at all. Since there is a freely-available Borland compiler for Windows now, I would expect it to become a popular choice if we supported it.