Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 28749 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2000 22:10:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 28735 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2000 22:10:31 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 17:10:30 -0500 From: Manoj Kasichainula To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: PATCH: APR buffered I/O Message-ID: <20000403171030.E8249@io.com> Mail-Followup-To: new-httpd@apache.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.9-current-20000328i In-Reply-To: ; from rbb@apache.org on Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 05:35:15PM -0400 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 05:35:15PM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote: > This patch brings up an interesting question. Do we even want to support > buffered I/O in APR? We supported it originally because Apache needed it > originally. Since then, Apache has removed ALL buffered I/O support, and > the support in APR has fallen by the way-side. +1 on removing anything depending on stdio I/O calls.