Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 59080 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2000 21:26:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 59069 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2000 21:26:53 -0000 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." To: Subject: RE: Speaking of bugs Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 16:26:41 -0500 Message-ID: <000f01bfb158$79e34880$345985d0@corecomm.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N There seems to be no link between GNATS http://bugs.apache.org/ to get over to bugzilla if the report is a 2.0a problem. I'd memorized bugs.apache.org, I would guess others have too, and don't know to look elsewhere.