httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@lyra.org>
Subject Re: Eliminating NO_USE_SIGACTION
Date Sat, 08 Apr 2000 10:27:27 GMT
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000 rbb@apache.org wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> > Speaking of ap_signal, is there any reason to maintain
> > NO_USE_SIGACTION anymore? Autoconf can detect the presence of
> > sigaction(), so we should do so and use HAVE_SIGACTION instead. Also,
> > I'd like to eliminate even bothering to check for ap_signal in
> > mpmt_pthread and dexter. Since sigaction is a POSIX call, and pthreads
> > imply proper POSIX support, I think it's unnecessary for MPMs using
> > pthreads to bother supporting non-sigaction systems.
>...
> I am also not sure that pthreads implies everything Posix works.  It is
> possible to be POSIX compliant in one area and not compliant in another.
> And, some platforms get certain Posix checks waived.

I agree with Ryan here.

+1 on keeping HAVE_SIGACTION and torching NO_USE_SIGACTION.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/


Mime
View raw message