httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@apache.org
Subject Re: Eliminating NO_USE_SIGACTION
Date Wed, 05 Apr 2000 14:08:20 GMT
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 12:03:33AM -0700, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> > Since sigaction is a POSIX call, and pthreads
> > imply proper POSIX support, I think it's unnecessary for MPMs using
> > pthreads to bother supporting non-sigaction systems.
> 
> BTW, the other possibility is to just use ap_signal from APR
> everywhere. The only problem I see with this is that sigaction is far
> better at returning usable error codes (though there aren't really
> that many error codes defined for it).

I should have read on before responding.  :-)

Shouldn't APR be using sigaction where possible, and thus get the usable
error codes?

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message