httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Slemko <ma...@znep.com>
Subject Re: httpd-docs CVS modules
Date Fri, 21 Apr 2000 15:00:03 GMT
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Tony Finch wrote:

> Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com> wrote:
> 
> >And why invent a new naming scheme when we have one already for the
> >code trees?
> 
> Because the ASF develops more than just the httpd. Referring to the
> httpd as "Apache" will remain as a peculiarity.

No, I'm refering to "foo-v1" versus "foo-1.3".

I agree with making it httpd as long as everyone really is on board this
time with actually using "httpd" for things.

> >So it seems that there is only one stated reason to do this: to give other
> >people commit access to the docs.  Can you give some examples of who?  
> 
> Joshua Silve is an immediately obvious example.
> 
> >And why is it necessary to split it into a separate module to do so?
> 
> To simplify administrative stuff. I think Ken's idea is that access
> control is based on complete modules, rather than arbitrary directory
> trees.

Perhaps that is his idea.  If so, then his idea about how CVS works is
incorrect.


Mime
View raw message