httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: RANT: Absolute Paths and configure
Date Tue, 04 Apr 2000 17:41:21 GMT
rbb@apache.org wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> > My completely simple-minded approach is that APR should be configured
> > first. It determines what capabilities we have. MPM should be
> > configured after that and see which of those capabilities it
> > needs to use. In this approach, I guess, MM needs to be configured
> > before it all.
> 
> I don't believe MM needs to be configured before APR.  APR is currently
> being configured before MM, and this seems to work just fine.  I don't
> mind changing, as long as the APR configuration is ALWAYS independant.
> 

Can APR exist without MM? I thought that APR relied on MM for
it's shared memory support. So it's up to MM to determine what
flavor is available (mmap, shmget, whatever) and then APR uses
that. I may be mistaken though about how APR uses MM though.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"

Mime
View raw message