httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@lnd.com>
Subject RE: MS VC++ with 2.0
Date Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:39:24 GMT
The only people hitting the tree are committed committers...

I'll have the pl script for you tommorow to toggle.

I concur it is frustrating.  Thank you for mentioning the tree bloat.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 3:16 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: RE: MS VC++ with 2.0
> 
> 
> 
> > These changes harm nothing, everything still builds.  If 
> the .dsp project is then saved in 5.0, the 
> AllowPerConfigDependencies tag
> > is removed and the format reverts to 5.00.  I can see no 
> other effects.  I don't really care either way, as long as we 
> are clear we
> > don't start flipping 6.0 specific options, and therefore 
> break vc5 builds.
> 
> But it does matter, because if somebody using 5.0 saves the 
> file, then the
> changes are reverted.  This is a bad thing, because we'll end 
> up swapping
> back and forth between 5.0 and 6.0 dsp files.  This bloats 
> the CVS server,
> and it slows updating, because we could have to patch the 
> same dsp file
> multiple times, when all that has happened is that we have 
> gone between
> 5.0 and 6.0 files multiple times.  :-(
> 
> I guess since the majority of people doing Windows 
> development work are
> using 5.0, we should stick with 5.0.
> 
> Ryan
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________________
> Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------------
> 

Mime
View raw message