Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 85264 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2000 22:01:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 85249 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2000 22:01:21 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.4 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-PGP-KeyID: F88341D9 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 22:53:04 +0100 (CET) Sender: lars@hyperreal.org From: Lars Eilebrecht To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: RE: March 2000 Netcraft Web Server Survey (fwd) X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N According to Marc Slemko: > Not bad. Of course, it would be 0.91 percent higher if the > mod_x-httpd-php3_script were included in the Apache numbers. Not that > the Apache gains are necessarily really due to real gains in > the use of Apache, but that is another issue. > > Does any standard module do ugly things like: > > Server: mod_x-httpd-php3_script Apache/1.3.11 (Unix) > > or is that just a hack local to webmailer.de? webmailer.de is the server hosting all 'Strato' sites (one of the biggest web-hosting companies in germany in terms of domains/sites). A friend of mine is maintaining the server and he told me some time ago that they are using a hacked module. The ordering in the server header is not intentional. I forgot about the reason why the ordering is messed up, but I'll contact him and try 'fixing' this for the next survey. ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht - Instant programmer... just add coffee! lars@hyperreal.org