Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 62248 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2000 21:27:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 62234 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2000 21:27:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:31:27 -0800 (PST) From: Greg Stein To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: OS/390 specific directory in 2.0 In-Reply-To: <200003222055.PAA30595@k5.localdomain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > I believe Martin suggested an EBCDIC _module_, not _directory_. > > Theological distinction? > > I don't know. I just got here :) hehe... A module would be cleaner. It fits into a "plugin" mechanism rather than a custom configuration/build mechanism. IMO, modules are always preferred over new configure/build mechanisms. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/