Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 63967 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2000 03:12:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 63956 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2000 03:12:53 -0000 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 19:12:52 -0800 (PST) From: Ask Bjoern Hansen To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Time for a 2.0o alpha. In-Reply-To: <01ad01bf83c1$7cc0f350$064b2509@raleigh.ibm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > Along the same lines, a list of things known not to work yet in 2.0 would > be > > nice. > > > I'll second that. We don't want to hear reports about things being broken > that we already know about. How should we collect feedback? Should we open a > new bug DB or use the existing DB? I haven't checked, but I doubt there is > an option for specifying the apache_2.0 release in the current bug DB. It would be a good time to move to bugzilla or something. (Assuming that we want that). I think bugzilla is already installed somewhere on locus. I'd be happy to volunteer to install and maintain it if not. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen - more than 70M impressions per day,