Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 88785 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2000 02:42:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 88768 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2000 02:42:10 -0000 Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000328213924.00af1a20@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: gregmm@pop.ma.ultranet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:42:21 -0500 To: new-httpd@apache.org, From: Greg Marr Subject: Re: [patch:revision] APR 2.0 - linkage mechanisms In-Reply-To: <03ae01bf9904$8c181290$c1e01b09@raleigh.ibm.com> References: <000001bf97c4$c50a6440$345985d0@corecomm.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 05:25 PM 3/28/00 -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > Is anyone *not* in favor of eliminating the .mak files and invoking > (command > > line) msdev from makefile.win instead? > >I am not in favor of eliminating the win32 make files. Why start msdev >just to run a compile? Bleh. You can use msdev.exe to build from a DSW/DSP without actually opening up the IDE, just like you use NMAKE. msdev /? Usage: MSDEV [myprj.dsp|mywksp.dsw] - load project/workspace [] - load source file /? - display usage information /EX - execute a VBScript macro /OUT - redirect command line output to a file /USEENV - ignore tools.options.directories settings /MAKE [] [...] - build specified target(s) [ - ] [[|ALL] - [DEBUG|RELEASE|ALL]] /CLEAN - delete intermediate files but don't build /REBUILD - clean and build /NORECURSE - don't build dependent projects