Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 37891 invoked by uid 500); 13 Mar 2000 18:08:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 37862 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2000 18:08:29 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 05:08:20 +1100 From: Martin Pool To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: APACHE_2_0_ALPHA / apache-2.0a Message-ID: <20000314050820.D16928@sanguine.linuxcare.com.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ" User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from dgaudet-list-new-httpd@arctic.org on Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 09:47:31AM -0800 Sender: Martin Pool X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 09:47:31AM -0800, Dean Gaudet wrote: > i suppose it's too late for this... the tag should be APACHE_2_0a1 and the > version should be apache-2.0a1. the precedence is apache-1.3a1 ... you > never know if we'll have more than one alpha or not. Well, you can do=20 cvs rtag -r APACHE_2_0_ALPHA APACHE_2_0a1 apache-2.0 --=20 Martin Pool, (null), Linuxcare, Inc. +61 2 6262 8990 mbp@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution. --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE4zS6U634ChkDJAQkRATbwAJoDophBJDMcy+z3BbbW5WIg3cTbAACgmyMU qJK96b2LxrjwC801GFNZ7sQ= =oc5U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZmUaFz6apKcXQszQ--