Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-new-httpd-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 45265 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2000 14:17:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list new-httpd@apache.org Received: (qmail 45239 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2000 14:17:14 -0000 Message-Id: <200003041417.BAA12035@silk.apana.org.au> From: "Brian Havard" To: "new-httpd@apache.org" Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 01:17:03 +1000 (EST) Reply-To: "Brian Havard" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2.10.1999 for OS/2 Warp 4.00 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/src/lib/apr/file_io/os2 filedup.c fileio.h open.c pipe.c X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 3 Mar 2000 22:42:10 -0500 (EST), rbb@apache.org wrote: >On 3 Mar 2000 bjh@locus.apache.org wrote: > >> bjh 00/03/03 06:57:01 >> >> Modified: src/lib/apr/file_io/os2 filedup.c fileio.h open.c pipe.c >> Log: >> OS/2: file_cleanup() should be namespace protected as it's not static. > >In general, I agree with this, but the decision was made that apr >functions should have the ap_ prefix, not apr_. Well, I figured that it's internal to apr so using apr_ was a good way to indicate this. If that's not liked I'm happy to change it. -- ______________________________________________________________________________ | Brian Havard | "He is not the messiah! | | brianh@kheldar.apana.org.au | He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------