httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Life is hard, and then you die." <ron...@innovation.ch>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apache-2.0/htdocs/manual/developer layeredio.html
Date Mon, 27 Mar 2000 17:44:23 GMT

One day, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> 
> > I had a couple of ways of doing the I/O layers,
> > but any method that hid the layers from the module writers required a
> > buffer to write to and read from that killer performance and increased our
> > memory size expoentially.
> 
> It is clear that you need an extra buffer if more than one handler want
> to act on the data. That's not the point. The point is that the decision
> whether this extra buffer is required should be a lazy decision (i.e. on
> demand) and which is done by the buffer library and not the users (the
> content handlers) of the buffer library.

Hmm, why do you need a buffer? Maybe I'm just being dense, but "all
layering does" is add to the call chain, i.e. an ap_bwrite(fb, buf, ...)
by the producer passes the buf to next guy in the chain, who can either
do something with it or pass that buf directly on.


  Cheers,

  Ronald


Mime
View raw message