httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: DSO Patch 1 of 3 (+ commentary!)
Date Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:21:51 GMT
+1 !

David Reid wrote:
> 
> I still think that we should look at moving the DSO stuff into lib/apr/dso.
> If we start doing that now, and of course getting a test program to make
> sure it works!!, then we can move the stuff out of the main apache code.
> When we're ready to build and use dynamic modules then we'll have the
> apparatus built, just need to start using it :)
> 
> d.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg Stein" <gstein@lyra.org>
> To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2000 12:44 PM
> Subject: Re: DSO Patch 1 of 3 (+ commentary!)
> 
> 
> > On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 12:11:12PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > > > > Also, will
> > > > > dsotool support backward compatibility with libtool?
> > > >
> > > > No, it cannot. Because dsotool's functionality is a _subset_ of
> > > > libtool's functionality.
> > >
> > > I meant to ask about backward compatibility with the subset, honest.
> > > :). This should be all we need.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > +1 on looking into dropping libtool and using dsotool *later* when Ralf
> > has released something. Until then, I don't think we need to bother.
> >
> > Hrm. This does have an effect on the origination of this thread: the DSO
> > patches and use of libtdl. Should we use that for now, or just go with the
> > status quo for a while? hrm...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -g
> >
> > --
> > Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
> >
> >
> >
> 


-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"

Mime
View raw message