httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Tempnam(3), Tempfile(3) vs mktemp(3) on BSD
Date Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:40:51 GMT
rbb@apache.org wrote:
> 
> That may be so, but we searched at IBM for a couple of days to find the
> correct API's to make unnamed pipes non-blocking.  We couldn't do it.
> Now, maybe we just missed the right function, but we couldn't do it.  If
> you can find the API's to implement non-blocking I/O with unnamed pipes,
> send a patch.  Regardless, we can always just have Apache generate the
> name itself.
> 

As long as we don't fall into the same troubles with soooo many
tmpnam() implementations :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
                "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"

Mime
View raw message