httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: Apache 2.0 Alpha.
Date Sun, 05 Mar 2000 10:00:57 GMT
I think Manoj's point about deciding which configuration was a valid one.
Do we ditch the existing and use the new buildconf, (in which case does it
need moving up a directory??) or keep both?  It'd be neater to just have one
and would force people to use it which might be more useful.

david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Bloom" <rbb@ntrnet.net>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2000 3:33 AM
Subject: Apache 2.0 Alpha.


>
> Tomorrow is the day that I was supposed to put together the 2.0 alpha.  My
> impression from the response when I brought this up, is that the group is
> basically against an alpha of 2.0 right now.  I personally think this is a
> mistake, but if that is the wishes of the group, then I won't announce an
> alpha tomorrow.  Please correct me if I mis-read the groups opinion.
>
> Also, please consider your reasons for not wanting an alpha.  An alpha
> release is meant to bring people to the project, so bugs can be found and
> dealt with.
>
> I would like to release the alpha ASAP, if not tomorrow, then sometime
> during Apache Con.
>
> Ryan
>
>
> Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation
> Conference!!!   <http://ApacheCon.Com/>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________
___
> Ryan Bloom                        rbb@apache.org
> 406 29th St.
> San Francisco, CA 94131
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
>
>


Mime
View raw message