Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 431 invoked by uid 6000); 1 Feb 2000 16:38:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 367 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2000 16:38:41 -0000 Received: from web1.ntrnet.net (206.66.160.5) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2000 16:38:41 -0000 Received: from mail.ntrnet.net (mail.ntrnet.net [206.66.160.4]) by web1.ntrnet.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA17206 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 11:38:39 -0500 Received: from shell.ntrnet.net (squid.ntrnet.net [206.66.160.7]) by mail.ntrnet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720E976808 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 11:38:39 -0500 (EST) Received: (from rbb@localhost) by shell.ntrnet.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA18162; Tue, 1 Feb 2000 11:38:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 11:38:38 -0500 (EST) From: rbb@apache.org X-Sender: rbb@shell.ntrnet.net To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: ap_dir_entry_mtime() In-Reply-To: <00f301bf6ca6$ffa3a970$0a1aa8c0@jetnet.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Status: O On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, David Reid wrote: > I would have thought APR time to be consistent. > > > Should it return unix time (seconds since Unix epoch) or APR time > > (microseconds since Unix epoch)? It currently returns unixtime. I think it > > should return APR time. > > It should definately be returning APR time. This if left over from when we didn't have APR time finished, but file stuff was done. Ryan Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation Conference!!! _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@ntrnet.net 2121 Stonehenge Dr. Apt #3 Raleigh, NC 27615 Ryan Bloom -- thinker, adventurer, artist, writer, but mostly, friend. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------