Mailing-List: contact new-httpd-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@lnd.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Subject: RE: Mirror site discussion - another thought...
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 15:28:07 -0600
Message-ID: <000201bf82fb$e3ed86e0$345985d0@corecomm.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <001501bf8277$d2831bb0$cc20e220@raleigh.ibm.com>
Importance: Normal

Nooo.... I ment that literally, there was no version 1.3.11 (nor .12) - the
last update appeared to be November with 1.3.9.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:stoddard@raleigh.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 11:43 PM
> To: new-httpd@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Mirror site discussion - another thought...
>
>
> I just cleaned up the win32 binaries directory earlier this
> afternoon. The
> mirrors haven't picked up the change yet. Give it a day or so.
>
> ______________________________________________
> Bill Stoddard
>
> Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation
> Conference!  <http://ApacheCon.Com/>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@lnd.com>
> To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 11:35 PM
> Subject: Mirror site discussion - another thought...
>
>
> > I just tossed out a 1.3.12 notice in the windows forum for the Win32
> > binaries availablity, and wanted to note how the mirror
> sites reflect the
> > path specs.
> >
> > I noticed that
http://dolemite.toronto.com/apache/dist/binaries/win32/
> is so far out of date that it doesn't include the 1.3.11 build.
>
> Not picking on this one mirror, but would it make sense to run a bot
> periodically against our 'proscribed' list of mirrors, and single out
those
> that are > one week/month/year out of date?
>
> Bill
>
> pps obviously some push-pull mechanism will alievate some of this, tho not
> all mirror operators may be willing to use such a method.
>