Return-Path: Delivered-To: new-httpd-archive@hyperreal.org Received: (qmail 8286 invoked by uid 6000); 11 Jan 2000 19:02:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 8135 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2000 19:02:04 -0000 Received: from nebula.lyra.org (gstein@216.98.236.100) by taz.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2000 19:02:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (gstein@localhost) by nebula.lyra.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19511 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:05:57 -0800 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:05:57 -0800 (PST) From: Greg Stein To: new-httpd@apache.org Subject: Re: Annoying unusual bug. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org Status: O On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > Any other thoughts? If not, I will implement this for Apache 2.0 very > > > soon. > > > > I would say to use your approach for 2.0. In the 1.3 series, I'd recommend > > *against* altering request_rec and just hard-code recognition of the 443 > > port. > > > > In other words: minimal change to 1.3 to fix the problem since we're > > "doing it right" in the 2.0 series. > > I was actually going to skip this completely for 1.3, and only implement > it for 2.0. I figure the case is so unusual that we can ignore it in 1.3 > until somebody actually submits a bug. The people who found the original > problem are going to just hack their side of things to make it work. Well then... +1! :-) -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/