Message-ID: <38727920.AE4FFDE1@algroup.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 22:50:08 +0000
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Organization: A.L. Group plc
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: new-httpd@apache.org
Subject: Re: apache2-ng7
References: <200001042120.QAA00508@devsys.jaguNET.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: new-httpd-owner@apache.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: new-httpd@apache.org
Status: O

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> I really, really, really have no idea why we can't have our "own"
> version of shtools. We already do, considering the files in helpers.
> But that was a discussion of long ago and created much heat and
> flame IIRC :/

Well, if we're on the subject of stuff we have no idea about, I still
can't understand how shtool can include Apache licensed code and yet be
GPLed.

Cheers,

Ben.

--
SECURE HOSTING AT THE BUNKER! http://www.thebunker.net/hosting.htm

http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
     - Indira Gandhi