httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manoj Kasichainula <>
Subject Re: Apache 2.0 brokenness...
Date Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:58:26 GMT
On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 01:10:31AM +0000, Ben Laurie wrote:
> d) It ought to be possible to know whether serialised accepts are
> required (or a good/bad idea), but I can only imagine that this has to
> be based simply on knowing what the particular OS likes, requiring a
> mechanism similar to the old Configure. Does anyone know different?

It's true. Serializaed accepts are necessary to avoid OS bugs (We saw
some AIX 4.2 crashes when testing without serialization), and to deal
with hard-to-test thundering herd problems (less of a problem in
Dexter than the other Unix MPMs).

View raw message