httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: apache2-ng7
Date Tue, 04 Jan 2000 21:20:34 GMT
I really, really, really have no idea why we can't have our "own"
version of shtools. We already do, considering the files in helpers.
But that was a discussion of long ago and created much heat and
flame IIRC :/

Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 03:00:09PM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> >     As mentioned earlier, I have started to work on improving the
> >     current automake-based build environment. 
> I've just downloaded it, and it looks nice, though I haven't tried any
> of it yet.
> I really, really (really) hate to bring up licensing stuff; I don't
> care that much anyway. But this uses shtool, which is GPL. I don't
> know, and Ralf should correct me if I'm wrong, but if there were
> changes made by people besides Ralf, then shtool can't be relicensed
> Apache-style, and his interpretation on the viral effects of adding
> GPLed code may not be the only one that matters.
> I will do my penance now, if I can find some broccoli to eat.

   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [|]
                "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"

View raw message