httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <ab...@dial.pipex.com>
Subject Re: Test the baby...
Date Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:10:58 GMT
Personally I still like the idea of having custom .conf files for Apache 2.0
where the content is built from the modules you include.  This should make
the file more relevant and stop confusion when the MPM setting up becomes an
issue.

But then it was my idea...so I guess I should like it!

:-))
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Jagielski" <jim@jaguNET.com>
To: <new-httpd@apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: Test the baby...


> Eli Marmor wrote:
> >
> > > Plus a NetWare specific httpd.conf file.
> >
> > We are beginning to loose control (not to mention the need to maintain
> > specific httpd.conf for any platform). Can't we just add "IfDefine" to
> > httpd.conf?  IMHO, even the win version should work this way, but this
> > will need a new release. But in any case, before removing existing
> > versions of httpd.conf by integrating them into the standard httpd.conf,
> > we should avoid addition of NEW versions of httpd.conf.
> >
>
> That is all well and good, you know, better ideas on how to
> implement things, but not a handful of days before we release
> a new version. The fact is: (1) that the additions were
> pure docs (2) that they should have been included beforehand
> and (3) without them the Netware port would have been
> "unusable" (in as far as no-one knowing how to use it).
>
> If you want to bring this up after 1.3.11 is out, then that's a
> good idea. If you want to mention it regarding 2.0, even better.
> But no way are we futzing around with implementing something
> new and different so close to a release.
>
> --
>
===========================================================================
>    Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
>                 "Are you suggesting coconuts migrate??"


Mime
View raw message